Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dispute causation: Identification of pathogenic influences in construction

  • Peter Love
  • , Peter Davis
  • , Joanne Ellis
  • , Sai On Cheung

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose - While a considerable amount of knowledge has been accumulated about dispute causation, disputes continue to prevail and disharmonise the process of construction with considerable cost. This paper seeks to identify the underlying pathogens that clients and contractors perceive to contribute to disputes in construction projects. The identification of pathogens can provide an ameliorated understanding of the origin of disputes and therefore enable their prevention. Design/methodology/approach - Case law and focus groups with a client and contracting organisation from Western Australia are used to determine the pathogens of disputes. Findings - Analysis of the case law findings revealed that the underlying issues that were brought to litigation were to do with points of law, namely "civil procedure". A significant number of disputes are thus settled using alternative dispute resolution methods such as adjudication, arbitration and mediation. For clients the underlying latent conditions that resulted in a dispute were due to the nature of the task being performed (e.g. failure to detect and correct errors) and those arising from people's deliberate practices (e.g. failure to oblige by contractual requirements). For the contractor focus group the circumstances arising from the situation or environment the project was operating in were identified as the main underlying latent condition for disputes (e.g. unforeseen scope changes). Research limitations/implications - Focus groups are only undertaken with clients and contracting groups as they were identified as the main parties involved in dispute during the analysis of litigation cases within Western Australia. Input from consultants and subcontractors may provide a more balanced perspective as to the perceived causes and costs of disputes. Originality/value - The research has been able to provide the initial building blocks for understanding the underlying pathogens contributing to disputes. However, more empirical research is required before conclusive findings can be made, particularly with regard to the influences on subcontractors. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)404-423
    JournalEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Research Keywords

    • Australia
    • Case law
    • Construction industry
    • Contracts
    • Costs
    • Disputes

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dispute causation: Identification of pathogenic influences in construction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this