Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development of comprehensive earthquake loss scenarios for a Greek and a Turkish city: Seismic hazard, geotechnical and lifeline aspects

Kyriazis D. Pitilakis*, Anastasios I. Anastasiadis, Kalliopi G. Kakderi, Maria V. Manakou, Dimitra K. Manou, Maria N. Alexoudi, Stavroula D. Fotopoulou, Sotiris A. Argyroudis, Kostas G. Senetakis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

The development of reliable earthquake mitigation plans and seismic risk management procedures can only be based on the establishment of comprehensive earthquake hazard and loss scenarios. Two cities, Grevena (Greece) and Düzce (Turkey), were used as case studies in order to apply a comprehensive methodology for the vulnerability and loss assessment of lifelines. The methodology has the following distinctive phases: detailed inventory, identification of the typology of each component and system, evaluation of the probabilistic seismic hazard, geotechnical zonation, ground response analysis and estimation of the spatial distribution of seismic motion for different seismic scenarios, vulnerability analysis of the exposed elements at risk. Estimating adequate earthquake scenarios for different mean return periods, and selecting appropriate vulnerability functions, expected damages of the water and waste water systems in Düzce and of the roadway network and waste water system of Grevena are estimated and discussed; comparisons with observed earthquake damages are also made in the case of Düzce, proving the reliability and the efficiency of the proposed methodology. The results of the present study constitute a sound basis for the development of efficient loss scenarios for lifelines and infrastructure facilities in seismic prone areas. The first part of this paper, concerning the estimation of the seismic ground motions, has been utilized in the companion paper by Kappos et al. (2010) in the same journal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-232
JournalEarthquake and Structures
Volume2
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  2. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Research Keywords

  • Düzce
  • Grevena
  • Infrastructures
  • Lifelines
  • Microzonation
  • Seismic scenarios
  • Site effects
  • Vulnerability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of comprehensive earthquake loss scenarios for a Greek and a Turkish city: Seismic hazard, geotechnical and lifeline aspects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this