Abstract
Background: The prevalence of depression among China's elderly is high, but stigma surrounding mental illness and a shortage of psychiatrists limit widespread screening and diagnosis of geriatric depression. We sought to develop a screening tool using easy-to-obtain and minimally sensitive predictors to identify elderly Chinese with depressive symptoms (depression hereafter) for referral to mental health services and determine the most important factors for effective screening.
Methods: Using nationally representative survey data, we developed and externally validated the Chinese Geriatric Depression Risk calculator (CGD-Risk). CGD-Risk, a gradient boosting machine learning model, was evaluated based on discrimination (Concordance (C) statistic), calibration, and through a decision curve analysis. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on a cohort of middle-aged Chinese, a sub-group analysis using three data sets, and created predictor importance and partial dependence plots to enhance interpretability.
Results: A total of 5681 elderly Chinese were included in the development data and 12,373 in the external validation data. CGD-Risk showed good discrimination during internal validation (C: 0.81, 95 % CI 0.79 to 0.84) and external validation (C: 0.77, 95 % CI: 0.76, 0.78). Compared to an alternative screening strategy CGD-Risk would correctly identify 17.8 more elderly with depression per 100 people screened.
Limitations: We were only able to externally validate a partial version of CGD-Risk due to differences between the internal and external validation data.
Conclusions: CGD-Risk is a clinically viable, minimally sensitive screening tool that could identify elderly Chinese at high risk of depression while circumventing issues of response bias from stigma surrounding emotional openness.
Methods: Using nationally representative survey data, we developed and externally validated the Chinese Geriatric Depression Risk calculator (CGD-Risk). CGD-Risk, a gradient boosting machine learning model, was evaluated based on discrimination (Concordance (C) statistic), calibration, and through a decision curve analysis. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on a cohort of middle-aged Chinese, a sub-group analysis using three data sets, and created predictor importance and partial dependence plots to enhance interpretability.
Results: A total of 5681 elderly Chinese were included in the development data and 12,373 in the external validation data. CGD-Risk showed good discrimination during internal validation (C: 0.81, 95 % CI 0.79 to 0.84) and external validation (C: 0.77, 95 % CI: 0.76, 0.78). Compared to an alternative screening strategy CGD-Risk would correctly identify 17.8 more elderly with depression per 100 people screened.
Limitations: We were only able to externally validate a partial version of CGD-Risk due to differences between the internal and external validation data.
Conclusions: CGD-Risk is a clinically viable, minimally sensitive screening tool that could identify elderly Chinese at high risk of depression while circumventing issues of response bias from stigma surrounding emotional openness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 428-436 |
| Journal | Journal of Affective Disorders |
| Volume | 319 |
| Online published | 20 Sept 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Dec 2022 |
Research Keywords
- Depression
- Machine learning
- Prediction
- China
- Geriatrics