Describing the morphology of 2H martensite using group theory part I: Theory

J. J. Zhu, K. M. Liew

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is devoted to a clear and simple group theory description of the morphology and microstructure (including the orientation relationships among lattice correspondence variants, habit plane variants and the self-accommodation diamond) of 2H martensite in shape memory alloys (SMAs). There are 24 elements in point group ℘ 24 of DO 3 austenite, and they correspond to 24 habit plane variants. These 24 habit plane variants form a cubic group. Martensite point group ℘ 4 is a subgroup of ℘ 24 and 4 habit plane variants that, correspond to ℘ 4 and form a correspondence variant dominant group. A cubic group can be divided into six correspondence variant dominant groups that correspond to six elements of ℒ 6 - the left co-set of ℘ 4 in ℘ 24. The point group ℒ 4 is also a subgroup of ℘ 24 and is a self-accommodation group in 2H martensite. 4 normal directions of habit plane variants in self-accommodation group ℒ 4 cluster together along one [110] direction. A cubic group can be divided into six self-accommodation equivalent classes, which correspond to six self-accommodation martensite diamonds. There are 4 different cubic groups in 2H martensite. Thus, there are 96 martensite habit plane variants that correspond to 192 normal habit plane directions and 48 phase transformation eigenstrains.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-225
JournalMechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Describing the morphology of 2H martensite using group theory part I: Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this