Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Deep-learning-based survival prediction of patients with lower limb melanoma

  • Jinrong Zhang (Co-first Author)
  • , Hai Yu (Co-first Author)
  • , Xinkai Zheng (Co-first Author)
  • , Wai-kit Ming
  • , Yau Sun Lak
  • , Kong Ching Tom
  • , Alice Lee
  • , Hui Huang
  • , Wenhui Chen* (Co-last Author)
  • , Jun Lyu* (Co-last Author)
  • , Liehua Deng* (Co-last Author)
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

76 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

Background  For the purpose to examine lower limb melanoma (LLM) and its long-term survival rate, we used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. To estimate the prognosis of LLM patients and assess its efficacy, we used a powerful deep learning and neural network approach called DeepSurv.
Methods  We gathered data on those who had an LLM diagnosis between 2000 and 2019 from the SEER database. We divided the people into training and testing cohorts at a 7:3 ratio using a random selection technique. To assess the likelihood that LLM patients would survive, we compared the results of the DeepSurv model with those of the Cox proportional-hazards (CoxPH) model. Calibration curves, the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the concordance index (C-index) were all used to assess how accurate the predictions were.
Results  In this study, a total of 26,243 LLM patients were enrolled, with 7873 serving as the testing cohort and 18,370 as the training cohort. Significant correlations with age, gender, AJCC stage, chemotherapy status, surgery status, regional lymph node removal and the survival outcomes of LLM patients were found by the CoxPH model. The CoxPH model’s C-index was 0.766, which signifies a good degree of predicted accuracy. Additionally, we created the DeepSurv model using the training cohort data, which had a higher C-index of 0.852. In addition to calculating the 3-, 5-, and 8-year AUC values, the predictive performance of both models was evaluated. The equivalent AUC values for the CoxPH model were 0.795, 0.767, and 0.847, respectively. The DeepSurv model, in comparison, had better AUC values of 0.872, 0.858, and 0.847. In comparison to the CoxPH model, the DeepSurv model demonstrated greater prediction performance for LLM patients, as shown by the AUC values and the calibration curve.
Conclusion  We created the DeepSurv model using LLM patient data from the SEER database, which performed better than the CoxPH model in predicting the survival time of LLM patients.

© The Author(s) 2023
Original languageEnglish
Article number218
JournalDiscover Oncology
Volume14
Online published30 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Keywords

  • DeepSurv
  • Lower limb melanoma
  • Neural network
  • SEER
  • Survival prediction

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deep-learning-based survival prediction of patients with lower limb melanoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this