TY - JOUR
T1 - Data-Driven Development of Three-Dimensional Subsurface Models from Sparse Measurements Using Bayesian Compressive Sampling
T2 - A Benchmarking Study
AU - Lyu, Borui
AU - Hu, Yue
AU - Wang, Yu
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - With the rapid development of computing and digital technologies recently, three-dimensional (3D) subsurface models for accurate site characterization have received increasing attention, for example, with various data-driven methods developed for 3D subsurface modeling. This leads to a need for validating the 3D modeling results obtained from each method and comparing the performance of different methods in a fair and consistent manner. To address this need, a benchmarking study, which is often used in machine learning (ML), is presented in this study to compare the performance of different 3D subsurface modeling methods in four aspects, including accuracy, uncertainty, robustness, and computational efficiency. A suite of performance metrics is proposed for the four aspects above. Multiple sets of real cone penetration test (CPT) data are compiled in the benchmarking study for quantifying performance of 3D modeling methods using sparse measurements as input, a typical scenario in geotechnical practice. The benchmarking study is illustrated using an in-house software package called Analytics of Sparse Spatial Data based on Bayesian compressive sampling/sensing (ASSD-BCS), which can directly generate high-resolution 3D random field samples (RFSs) from sparse measurements. The evaluation results show that ASSD-BCS provides accurate estimates with quantified uncertainty from sparse measurements. In addition, ASSD-BCS exhibits remarkably high computational efficiency and performs robustly under different benchmarking cases. © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
AB - With the rapid development of computing and digital technologies recently, three-dimensional (3D) subsurface models for accurate site characterization have received increasing attention, for example, with various data-driven methods developed for 3D subsurface modeling. This leads to a need for validating the 3D modeling results obtained from each method and comparing the performance of different methods in a fair and consistent manner. To address this need, a benchmarking study, which is often used in machine learning (ML), is presented in this study to compare the performance of different 3D subsurface modeling methods in four aspects, including accuracy, uncertainty, robustness, and computational efficiency. A suite of performance metrics is proposed for the four aspects above. Multiple sets of real cone penetration test (CPT) data are compiled in the benchmarking study for quantifying performance of 3D modeling methods using sparse measurements as input, a typical scenario in geotechnical practice. The benchmarking study is illustrated using an in-house software package called Analytics of Sparse Spatial Data based on Bayesian compressive sampling/sensing (ASSD-BCS), which can directly generate high-resolution 3D random field samples (RFSs) from sparse measurements. The evaluation results show that ASSD-BCS provides accurate estimates with quantified uncertainty from sparse measurements. In addition, ASSD-BCS exhibits remarkably high computational efficiency and performs robustly under different benchmarking cases. © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
KW - Bayesian compressive sensing/sampling (BCS)
KW - Benchmarking study
KW - Cone penetration test (CPT)
KW - Three dimensional (3D) subsurface modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148055002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148055002&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-935
DO - 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-935
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 2376-7642
VL - 9
JO - ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
JF - ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
IS - 2
M1 - 04023010
ER -