Abstract
Social media present prime opportunities for commercial brands to promote their products. Some user-generated comments, however, hamper brands’ promotion efforts with fake claims. The literature on warranting theory suggests that if a company controls the dissemination of user-generated comments of its products, it may backfire against the company by reducing the warranting value of favorable comments. The current study proposes that a company’s justification for their information control behavior can restore the warranting value of user-generated comments. Drawing upon the literature on fairness theory and mindlessness, the study investigated the effectiveness of two types of justifications varying in their legitimacy. Results from a web-based experiment (N = 221) with four conditions (no evidence of dissemination control vs. no justification vs. placebic justification vs. real justification) confirm that when a company offers a legitimate justification for deleting users’ comments, it mitigates negative evaluations that may result from the company’s information control behavior.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 838-859 |
| Journal | Communication Research |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Online published | 21 Aug 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Research Keywords
- e-commerce
- justification
- online reviews
- social media
- warranting theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Curbing Negativity: Influence of Providing Justifications About Control Over User-Generated Comments on Social Media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver