Abstract
In this article I argue that participatory video must acknowledge its often technocratic, liberal presumptions, and take a more critical look at the political underpinnings of ‘empowerment’ and ‘voice’. I am interested in how we can use participatory video while resisting the romance of community, seeing beyond short‐term individualist approaches towards a longer‐term collective project of social justice. A reflexive approach to how power and agency work within participatory video is essential if the method is going to effect change and not merely manage social conflict. While the participatory video process can be discussed from many perspectives, I focus here on a critique of the often‐hidden politics of participatory video, its relation to academic research and in turn, to project participants within a progressive social change agenda.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 56 - 68 |
| Journal | Area |
| Volume | 1475 |
| Issue number | 4762 |
| Online published | 23 May 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research Keywords
- participatory video
- liberalism
- participation
Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critiquing the politics of participatory video and the dangerous romance of liberalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver