Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Crack detection of beam-type structures following the bayesian system identification framework

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 22 - Publication in policy or professional journal

    Abstract

    This paper puts forward a method for the detection of crack locations and extents on a structural member utilizing measured dynamic responses following the Bayesian probabilistic framework. In the proposed crack detection method a beam with different number of cracks is modelled using different classes of models. The Bayesian model class selection method is then applied to select the "most plausible" class of models in order to identify the number of cracks on the structural member. The objective of the proposed method is not to pinpoint the crack locations and extents but to calculate the posterior (updated) probability density function (PDF) of crack parameters (i.e., crack locations and extents). The method explicitly handles the uncertainties introduced by measurement noise and modelling error. This paper presents not only the theoretical development of the proposed method but also the numerical and experimental verifications. In the numerical case studies, noisy data generated by a Bernoulli-Euler beam with semi-rigid connections is used to demonstrate the procedures of the proposed method. The method is finally verified by measured dynamic responses of a cantilever beam utilizing laser Doppler vibrometer. © 2008 IOP Publishing Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number12030
    JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
    Volume124
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    Event4th Applied Inverse Problems International Conference, AIP 2007 and the 1st Congress of the Inverse Problems International Association, IPIA 2007 - Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Duration: 25 Jun 200729 Jun 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Crack detection of beam-type structures following the bayesian system identification framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this