COVID-19 emergency measures and the impending authoritarian pandemic

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

102 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Article numberlsaa064
Journal / PublicationJournal of Law and the Biosciences
Volume7
Issue number1
Online published20 Sept 2020
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Link(s)

Abstract

COVID-19 has brought the world grinding to a halt. As of early August 2020, the greatest public health emergency of the century thus far has registered almost 20 million infected people and claimed over 730,000 lives across all inhabited continents, bringing public health systems to their knees, and causing shutdowns of borders and lockdowns of cities, regions, and even nations unprecedented in the modern era. Yet, as this Article demonstrates - with diverse examples drawn from across the world - there are unmistakable regressions into authoritarianism in governmental efforts to contain the virus. Despite the unprecedented nature of this challenge, there is no sound justification for systemic erosion of rights-protective democratic ideals and institutions beyond that which is strictly demanded by the exigencies of the pandemic. A Wuhan-inspired all-or-nothing approach to viral containment sets a dangerous precedent for future pandemics and disasters, with the global copycat response indicating an impending 'pandemic' of a different sort, that of authoritarianization. With a gratuitous toll being inflicted on democracy, civil liberties, fundamental freedoms, healthcare ethics, and human dignity, this has the potential to unleash humanitarian crises no less devastating than COVID-19 in the long run.

Research Area(s)

  • COVID-19, Democracy, Emergency Powers, Governance, Human Rights, Regulation

Download Statistics

No data available