Abstract
This paper provides the results of a cost-benefit analysis for BeO-UO 2 nuclear fuel, material that contains a small volume fraction of Be in uranium oxide matrix. According to the cost-benefit analysis results, the optimized BeO content was about 4.8 wt% when the BeO and uranium oxide prices were assumed to be $317/kg and $64/kg, respectively. The benefit of increasing the thermal conductivity of BeO-UO2 fuel was greater than the burden of the expensive BeO material price if the BeO content was 4.8 wt%. In addition, the break-even point of the nuclear fuel cycle cost as a function of the burn-up was 4.4 mills/kWh when compared economically between BeO-UO2 fuel and UO2 fuel. Therefore, BeO-UO2 fuel seems economically efficient when the burn-up is more than 60 MWD/kg because the nuclear fuel cycle cost of BeO-UO2 fuel was lower than that of UO2 fuel. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 813-821 |
| Journal | Progress in Nuclear Energy |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Research Keywords
- Beryllium
- Burn-up
- Cost-benefit analysis
- Nuclear fuel cycle
- Thermal conductivity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-benefit analysis of BeO-UO2 nuclear fuel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver