Abstract
The authors regret that the original version of this article contained numerical errors in Figure 2 within the main text and Table A1 of Appendix A. Supplementary data. Corrections that need to be made are presented as follows: • For Figure 2 in the main text, the label “0∼4mm SS (42.5%)” of a flow should be corrected to “0∼4mm SS (44.5%)”, as shown in Fig. C1 below. [Figure presented]• In Table A1 of Appendix A, the electricity usage for the “Wet processing” under the S1 BAU WP scenario should be corrected to “400 kWh” instead of “60,000 kWh”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused and state that the changes reported do not affect the scientific results and conclusions of the manuscript. © 2025 The Authors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 108152 |
| Journal | Resources, Conservation and Recycling |
| Volume | 216 |
| Online published | 13 Feb 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Eco-efficiency assessment of technological innovations in high-grade concrete recycling” [Resources, Conservation and Recycling 149 (2019) 649–663]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
-
Eco-efficiency assessment of technological innovations in high-grade concrete recycling
Zhang, C., Hu, M., Dong, L., Gebremariam, A., Mirand-Xicotencatl, B., Di Maio, F. & Tukker, A., Oct 2019, In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 149, p. 649-663Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Open AccessFile104 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)112 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver