Corrigendum to “Eco-efficiency assessment of technological innovations in high-grade concrete recycling” [Resources, Conservation and Recycling 149 (2019) 649–663]

Chunbo Zhang, Mingming Hu*, Liang Dong*, Abraham Gebremariam, Brenda Miranda-Xicotencatl, Francesco Di Maio, Arnold Tukker

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsErratumpeer-review

    Abstract

    The authors regret that the original version of this article contained numerical errors in Figure 2 within the main text and Table A1 of Appendix A. Supplementary data. Corrections that need to be made are presented as follows: • For Figure 2 in the main text, the label “0∼4mm SS (42.5%)” of a flow should be corrected to “0∼4mm SS (44.5%)”, as shown in Fig. C1 below. [Figure presented]• In Table A1 of Appendix A, the electricity usage for the “Wet processing” under the S1 BAU WP scenario should be corrected to “400 kWh” instead of “60,000 kWh”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused and state that the changes reported do not affect the scientific results and conclusions of the manuscript. © 2025 The Authors.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number108152
    JournalResources, Conservation and Recycling
    Volume216
    Online published13 Feb 2025
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Eco-efficiency assessment of technological innovations in high-grade concrete recycling” [Resources, Conservation and Recycling 149 (2019) 649–663]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this