Correcting science misinformation in an authoritarian country: An experiment from China

Wenting Yu; Fei Shen; Chen Min

doi:10.1016/j.tele.2021.101749

Correcting science misinformation in an authoritarian country : An experiment from China

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Overview

View graph of relations

Author(s)

Related Research Unit(s)

Department of Media and Communication

Detail(s)

Original language	English
Article number	101749
Journal / Publication	Telematics and Informatics
Volume	66
Online published	28 Nov 2021
Publication status	Published - Jan 2022

Link(s)

DOI	DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101749 Final Published version
	Check@CityULib
Link to Scopus	https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85120933794&origin=recordpage
Permanent Link	https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(0cf10636-6406-435f-83aa-f469889a9180).html

Abstract

People rely on heuristic cues to evaluate messages. An increasing number of studies found corrective messages useful in correcting misinformation, and the correction effect varies on heuristic cues. Existing studies, however, mostly focus on correction effects in the Western context. This study aims to compare the effects of corrective messages with different heuristic cues in an authoritarian society. We focused on the cues that suggest government authoritativeness. Using an online experiment, we compared the impacts of correction sources (official vs. professional vs. layperson) and tones (formal vs. conversational) on the believability of the correction. The results indicated corrections from a government source and delivered in a formal tone were more believable in China. In addition, we examined the moderating role of attitude congruence.