Abstract
Can a company recover the value of the bribe from a director who has paid the bribe, on behalf of the company, to a third party to secure certain benefits for the company, and where it is not alleged that the director had personally benefitted from the bribe? This question raises several complex issues relating to directors’ standard of care, corporate authorisation and corporate illegality, which were considered by the recent decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp (formerly known as TTL Holdings).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 477-481 |
| Journal | Lloyd's Maritime & Commercial Law Quarterly |
| Issue number | Part 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'CORPORATE CLAIMS AGAINST DIRECTOR FOR PAYING BRIBES ON COMPANY’S BEHALF'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver