Abstract
Kelly (1992) has recently shown that evidence on convergence cannot be taken as evidence against endogenous growth in general. This study uses a well-known class of stochastic growth models to show other difficulties with traditional empirical studies of convergence. Key parameters typically cannot be estimated consistently in cross-section regressions. When the parameters are assumed known, implications for convergence arc unavailable except under restrictive and economically unmotivated assumptions. Those same assumptions that relate key parameters to cross-country convergence render cross-section regressions impossible to estimate consistently.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 535-547 |
| Journal | Journal of Monetary Economics |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Research Keywords
- Cross-country dependence
- Cross-country regression
- Increasing returns
- Stochastic growth
- Time-series regression
Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Convergence, endogenous growth, and productivity disturbances'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver