Convergence, endogenous growth, and productivity disturbances
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 535-547 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of Monetary Economics |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 1996 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
Kelly (1992) has recently shown that evidence on convergence cannot be taken as evidence against endogenous growth in general. This study uses a well-known class of stochastic growth models to show other difficulties with traditional empirical studies of convergence. Key parameters typically cannot be estimated consistently in cross-section regressions. When the parameters are assumed known, implications for convergence arc unavailable except under restrictive and economically unmotivated assumptions. Those same assumptions that relate key parameters to cross-country convergence render cross-section regressions impossible to estimate consistently.
Research Area(s)
- Cross-country dependence, Cross-country regression, Increasing returns, Stochastic growth, Time-series regression
Citation Format(s)
Convergence, endogenous growth, and productivity disturbances. / Leung, Charles Ka Yui; Quah, Danny T.
In: Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 12.1996, p. 535-547.
In: Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 12.1996, p. 535-547.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review