Abstract
The identification of H5N1 in domestic poultry in Europe has increased the risk of infection reaching most industrialized poultry populations. Here, using detailed data on the poultry population in Great Britain (GB), we show that currently planned interventions based on movement restrictions can be expected to control the majority of outbreaks. The probability that controls fail to keep an outbreak small only rises to significant levels if most transmission occurs via mechanisms which are both untraceable and largely independent of the local density of premises. We show that a predictor of the need to intensify control efforts in GB is whether an outbreak exceeds 20 infected premises. In such a scenario neither localized reactive vaccination nor localized culling are likely to have a substantial impact. The most effective of these contingent interventions are large radius (10 km) localized culling and national vaccination. However, the modest impact of these approaches must be balanced against their substantial inconvenience and cost. © 2007 The Royal Society.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2287-2295 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |
| Volume | 274 |
| Issue number | 1623 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Sept 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Research Keywords
- Avian influenza
- Control strategies
- Modelling
Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Control of a highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza outbreak in the GB poultry flock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver