Contractual Estoppel: Estoppel in Writing

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

From Re Stringer (1877) to Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2006) , the contractual estoppel has consistently held parties to contractual terms, including the assumed state of affairs. Against wider thinking that there is no theoretical basis to contractual estoppel, this article argues, by examining relevant case law, that voluntary undertaking or mutual assent of the parties best espouses the underlying principle that prevents either parties from asserting different facts. © 2022 Sweet & Maxwell and its Contributors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)208-218
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of International Banking Law and Regulation
Volume38
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Research Keywords

  • Consent
  • Contract terms
  • Contractual estoppel
  • Financial services
  • Jurisprudence
  • Undertakings

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contractual Estoppel: Estoppel in Writing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this