Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Contingency and responsibility in confucian political theory

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this article I investigate the Confucian sense of responsibility from the framework of “moral economy,” understood as a causal relationship between one’s virtue and non-moral goods including political position/success, and “contingency,” the failure of moral economy, and argue that early Confucians’ astute understanding of the contingent nature of the political world enabled them to subscribe to the non-causal sense of responsibility. Contrary to the common argument that Heaven was invoked by the Confucians in order to shield themselves from responsibility for their political failures, I argue that they imposed a more expanded sense of responsibility both on them and on the rulers, largely preoccupied with realpolitik. In their effort to restore moral economy between the ruler’s virtue and his political position in particular, I show Confucians engaged in what I call reverse moral economy, at the heart of which was to constrain the ruler’s arbitrary use of political power.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)615-636
    JournalPhilosophy and Social Criticism
    Volume44
    Issue number6
    Online published5 Jan 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

    Research Keywords

    • Confucianism
    • Contingency
    • Heaven
    • Moral economy
    • Responsibility

    RGC Funding Information

    • RGC-funded

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Contingency and responsibility in confucian political theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this