Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research : The case of amihud and lev
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 62_Review of books or of software (or similar publications/items) › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 367-375 |
| Journal / Publication | Strategic Management Journal |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
Strategie management research has been characterized as placing less emphasis on construct measurement than other management subfields. To illustrate the consequences of measurement error, we revisit the debate on the causes of diversification. Our research suggests that the divergent findings between studies on this topic are largely the result of measurement error, and that prior work has underestimated the true effect of size in the relationships between variables. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Research Area(s)
- Agency theory, Corporate governance, Diversification, Measurement, Research design, Type II error
Citation Format(s)
Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research: The case of amihud and lev. / Boyd, Brian K.; Gove, Steve; Hitt, Michael A.
In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, 04.2005, p. 367-375.
In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, 04.2005, p. 367-375.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 62_Review of books or of software (or similar publications/items) › peer-review
