Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Confucian Meritocracy and Passive Virtues

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Confucian meritocrats argue that moral education should not aim to make people politically active because doing so is not only inconsistent with the underlying assumptions of Confucian virtue ethics, but it is likely to make people more adversary and uncivil. According to Confucian meritocrats, moral education should aim at inculcating a particular set of virtues that are directly conducive to political meritocracy such as deference, dependence and paternalistic gratitude, or what I call ‘passive virtues’. This paper argues that unless public purposes are set clearly by the people themselves, it is impossible to know ex ante what sorts of character traits are to be considered good. The virtuous circle between active and virtuous citizenship and effective and virtuous political leadership is possible only when the regime is democratic, facilitating the extension of the self to the wider political world predicated on public purposes that bind all to one political community. © Edinburgh University Press
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-23
JournalJournal of Social and Political Philosophy
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.

Research Keywords

  • civic virtue
  • Confucian meritocrats
  • democracy
  • formative power of institutions
  • moral universalism
  • passive virtues

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Confucian Meritocracy and Passive Virtues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this