Confucian Humanitarian Intervention? Toward Democratic Theory

Sungmoon Kim*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    It is widely claimed that Mencius's account of punitive expedition can be understood as a Confucian justification of humanitarian intervention and thus has the potential to play the role of constraining China's imperial ventures abroad. This paper challenges this optimism, by drawing attention to internal and external obstacles - the problem of virtue's self-indulgence and the problem of justification to non-Confucians - that prevent Mencius's virtue-based political theory of punitive expedition from developing into a modern theory of humanitarian intervention. It argues that for the Mencian theory to be relevant in the modern world marked most notably by moral pluralism, it must be transformed into a democratic theory, at the center of which is the stipulation that humanitarian intervention be morally justified internally, that is, to the people of the intervening state, as well as externally, first to the people to be intervened state, and second to international society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)187-213
    JournalReview of Politics
    Volume79
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Confucian Humanitarian Intervention? Toward Democratic Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this