Abstract
Scholars in the humanities and social sciences are keenly aware of and often deeply engaged with more global or cosmopolitan approaches to their respective fields; nevertheless, theories of cosmopolitanism remain exceedingly controversial and arise exclusively from Western philosophical sources. Recently, Martha Nussbaum presented a contemporary Western liberal cosmopolitan theory and sought to integrate it with a call for multicultural education. In this essay, I describe, analyze, and criticize Nussbaum's conception of cosmopolitanism and argue that it does not sit comfortably with her laudable advocacy of multicultural education. I then draw upon resources within the Confucian tradition to sketch two alternative conceptions of cosmopolitanism, which I argue are both more powerful than what Nussbaum proposes and better support the kind of multicultural education she so eloquently advocates. © 2014 Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 22-44 |
| Journal | Journal of Religious Ethics |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Online published | 19 Jan 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Research Keywords
- Confucian
- cosmopolitan
- cultural diversity
- ideal guest
- Kant
- multicultural education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Confucian cosmopolitanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver