Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Conditions for the dissatisfying effect of reference group income

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary WorksRGC 12 - Chapter in an edited book (Author)peer-review

Abstract

Research has found a weak effect of the income of a supposed reference group on one's life satisfaction and assumed that social comparison theory explains the effect. This assumption is in need of further empirical examination. Specifically, the examination needs to identify the reference group with which one makes income comparisons. Based on this reference group, an elaboration of social comparison theory suggests two conditions for the impact of social comparison. Condition 1 suggests that reference group income is more dissatisfying when the reference group is larger. Condition 2 expects that income disparity is less dissatisfying when more of the reference group has comparable incomes. The test of the conditions in this study employs survey data obtained from 2,079 Hong Kong Chinese adults. Results manifested the two conditions based on personal income. In contrast, the main effect of reference group income on life satisfaction was too weak to be significant. Hence, the dissatisfying effect of reference group income is conditional on reference group size and the non-comparability of reference group income within the group. © 2012 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPsychology of Life Satisfaction
EditorsMatt Vassar
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherNova Science Publishers
Pages87-108
ISBN (Print)9781620813072, 1620813076
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Publication series

NamePsychology research progress series

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conditions for the dissatisfying effect of reference group income'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this