TY - JOUR
T1 - Complex normal form for strongly non-linear vibration systems exemplified by Buffing-van der Pol equation
AU - Leung, A. Y. T.
AU - Zhang, Q. C.
PY - 1998/6/25
Y1 - 1998/6/25
N2 - We extend the normal form method to study the asymptotic solutions of strongly non-linear oscillators ü+ ω2u = ƒ(u, u̇), where ƒ(u, u̇) contains only linear and cubic non-linear terms. The novel contribution is the ansatz u = ξ + ξ̄, u̇ = iω1(ξ - ξ̄) where ω1 is to be determined, allowing for the change of the fundamental frequency during the course of vibration, rather than using u = ξ + ξ̄, u̇ = iω(ξ - ξ̄) as suggested by Nayfeh. With the present method, not only the stability of the periodic solutions but also the asymptotic expressions for the periodic solutions can be obtained easily. The results obtained by the method presented coincide very well with the results obtained by numerical integration for the Duffing-van der Pol oscillator with ƒ(u, u̇) = μ (1 - u2)u̇ - βu3. When ω = μ = β= 1, Nayfeh's method gives qualitatively different results from the numerical integration while our method works well even when ω = 1, μ = β= 3, since Nayfeh's method is based on weak non-linearities and ω = 1, μ = β= 3 is beyond the valid range of assumption. © 1998 Academic Press Limited.
AB - We extend the normal form method to study the asymptotic solutions of strongly non-linear oscillators ü+ ω2u = ƒ(u, u̇), where ƒ(u, u̇) contains only linear and cubic non-linear terms. The novel contribution is the ansatz u = ξ + ξ̄, u̇ = iω1(ξ - ξ̄) where ω1 is to be determined, allowing for the change of the fundamental frequency during the course of vibration, rather than using u = ξ + ξ̄, u̇ = iω(ξ - ξ̄) as suggested by Nayfeh. With the present method, not only the stability of the periodic solutions but also the asymptotic expressions for the periodic solutions can be obtained easily. The results obtained by the method presented coincide very well with the results obtained by numerical integration for the Duffing-van der Pol oscillator with ƒ(u, u̇) = μ (1 - u2)u̇ - βu3. When ω = μ = β= 1, Nayfeh's method gives qualitatively different results from the numerical integration while our method works well even when ω = 1, μ = β= 3, since Nayfeh's method is based on weak non-linearities and ω = 1, μ = β= 3 is beyond the valid range of assumption. © 1998 Academic Press Limited.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0004875004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0004875004&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1006/jsvi.1998.1561
DO - 10.1006/jsvi.1998.1561
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 0022-460X
VL - 213
SP - 907
EP - 914
JO - Journal of Sound and Vibration
JF - Journal of Sound and Vibration
IS - 5
ER -