Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

COMPARISONS OF SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION METHODS FOR SYSTEMS OPERATING ON CLOSED-LOOP

  • Weilu Lin
  • , S. Joe Qin*
  • , Lennart Ljung
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary WorksRGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication)peer-review

Abstract

in this paper, we analyze two recently proposed closed-loop subspace identification methods, referred to as innovation estimation method and whitening filter approach respectively. The similarity and difference between them are investigated in detail. It turns out that all closed-loop subspace identification methods can be classified as one-step, two-step, or multi-stage projection methods. A SISO closed-loop simulation shows that to identify a consistent model the whitening filter approach might require longer future and past horizons than the innovation estimation method. Copyright © 2005 IFAC.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPROCEEDINGS of the 16th IFAC World Congress
PublisherElsevier
Pages494-499
ISBN (Print)008045108X, 9780080451084
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes
Event16th Triennial World Congress of International Federation of Automatic Control, IFAC 2005 - Prague, Czech Republic
Duration: 3 Jul 20058 Jul 2005
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ifac-proceedings-volumes/vol/38/issue/1

Publication series

NameIFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)
Number1
Volume38
ISSN (Print)1474-6670

Conference

Conference16th Triennial World Congress of International Federation of Automatic Control, IFAC 2005
PlaceCzech Republic
CityPrague
Period3/07/058/07/05
Internet address

Research Keywords

  • Closed-loop identification
  • Subspace algorithms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'COMPARISONS OF SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION METHODS FOR SYSTEMS OPERATING ON CLOSED-LOOP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this