Comparison of x-ray absorption and emission techniques for the investigation of paintings

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

6 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

  • A. Cabal
  • O. Schalm
  • P. Eyskens
  • P. Willems
  • P. Van Espen

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-148
Journal / PublicationX-Ray Spectrometry
Volume44
Issue number3
Online published5 Feb 2015
Publication statusPublished - May 2015
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Four x-ray techniques: computed radiography, emission radiography, energy-resolved radiography and imaging x-ray fluorescence were compared using four mock-up panel paintings. The paintings have different stratigraphy and pigments and are representative for different historical periods. One of the paintings has a hidden underlying painting. The type of pigments used mainly influences the information obtained by both the emission and absorption measurements; high-Z white pigment and high-Z color pigments giving the best contrast.
Each of the techniques revealed interesting aspects of the paintings, but none of them could reveal the hidden painting to a satisfactory level. Due to the statistical quality of the spectral data, x-ray fluorescence gives elemental images with high contrast. The radiographic images are better to reveal the internal structure.
Imaging x-ray fluorescence and energy-resolved radiography measurements can be done simultaneously, and the combination has the highest potential for the study of complex multilayer paintings.

Citation Format(s)

Comparison of x-ray absorption and emission techniques for the investigation of paintings. / Cabal, A.; Schalm, O.; Eyskens, P. et al.
In: X-Ray Spectrometry, Vol. 44, No. 3, 05.2015, p. 141-148.

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review