Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of x-ray absorption and emission techniques for the investigation of paintings

  • A. Cabal
  • , O. Schalm
  • , P. Eyskens
  • , P. Willems
  • , A. Harth
  • , P. Van Espen*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Four x-ray techniques: computed radiography, emission radiography, energy-resolved radiography and imaging x-ray fluorescence were compared using four mock-up panel paintings. The paintings have different stratigraphy and pigments and are representative for different historical periods. One of the paintings has a hidden underlying painting. The type of pigments used mainly influences the information obtained by both the emission and absorption measurements; high-Z white pigment and high-Z color pigments giving the best contrast.
Each of the techniques revealed interesting aspects of the paintings, but none of them could reveal the hidden painting to a satisfactory level. Due to the statistical quality of the spectral data, x-ray fluorescence gives elemental images with high contrast. The radiographic images are better to reveal the internal structure.
Imaging x-ray fluorescence and energy-resolved radiography measurements can be done simultaneously, and the combination has the highest potential for the study of complex multilayer paintings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-148
JournalX-Ray Spectrometry
Volume44
Issue number3
Online published5 Feb 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of x-ray absorption and emission techniques for the investigation of paintings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this