TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of two quantitative methods of determining rater bias
AU - Woods, R. C.
AU - Chan, K. L.
PY - 2003/10
Y1 - 2003/10
N2 - Two methods of detecting and quantifying rater bias, i.e., bias introduced by persons assessing projects, have recently been independently proposed. In this paper, the data used to demonstrate and introduce each method are analysed using the other method so that a meaningful comparison between the two methods may be made. It is found that the two methods are not exactly equivalent although the results from both are broadly similar.
AB - Two methods of detecting and quantifying rater bias, i.e., bias introduced by persons assessing projects, have recently been independently proposed. In this paper, the data used to demonstrate and introduce each method are analysed using the other method so that a meaningful comparison between the two methods may be made. It is found that the two methods are not exactly equivalent although the results from both are broadly similar.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142672089&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-3142672089&origin=recordpage
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1069-4730
VL - 92
SP - 295
EP - 306
JO - Journal of Engineering Education
JF - Journal of Engineering Education
IS - 4
ER -