Comparing carbon emissions of precast and cast-in-situ construction methods – A case study of high-rise private building

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

134 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations



Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-53
Journal / PublicationConstruction and Building Materials
Online published14 Sep 2015
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2015


Buildings are one of the primary contributors to carbon emissions. Given the small size of construction site and increasing housing demand in Hong Kong, precast concrete has been frequently adopted in not only public residential buildings, but also the private sector. This study compares the carbon emissions of precast and traditional cast-in-situ construction methods based on a case study of a private residential building in Hong Kong. Life cycle assessment (LCA) model is established to consider the system processes from cradle to end of construction. The comparison is conducted based on eight scenarios at four levels, i.e. cubic meter concrete, precast facade, group of façade elements, and an apartment. It is found that the carbon emission of the studied residential apartment is 669 kg carbon dioxide equivalent per one square meter floor area. Precasting can lead to 10% carbon reduction for one cubic meter concrete. Steel formwork for precasting performs better than timber formwork used in cast-in-situ concrete. Adopting more precast concrete can lead to less carbon emission. Based on the research findings, it is highly recommended to adopt precast concrete in building construction. The building industry should consider the carbon reduction as a benefit of implementing precast concrete. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Research Area(s)

  • Carbon emission, High-rise building, LCA, Precast concrete, Prefabrication, Private building

Citation Format(s)