Abstract
In this paper, five different types of water heating systems namely electric instantaneous, electric storage, natural gas instantaneous, natural gas storage, and heat pump are studied for Australian conditions. The study is carried out for understanding the life cycle cost of each system under similar water demand conditions. The focus is made on life-cycle cost (LCC) that include the running costs on an annual basis, and total running cost for the system life, maintenance cost; and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The observations reveal that five systems had major differences in the upfront cost, running cost, and life-cycle cost, and GHG emissions. The observed LCC and GHG emissions for electric instantaneous, electric storage, natural gas instantaneous, natural gas storage, and heat pump are 9005 AU$, 12,724 AU$, 6955 AU$, 7479 AU$, and 8098 AU$, and 1862 tons of CO2, 2306 tons of CO2, 851 tons of CO2, 917 tons of CO2, and 842 tons of CO2 respectively.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 748-751 |
| Journal | Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Online published | 1 Dec 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Research Keywords
- Solar water heater
- Life-cycle cost
- Heat pump
- Gas heated water
- Electrically heated water
- GHG emissions from water heating
Publisher's Copyright Statement
- This full text is made available under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative life-cycle cost and GHG emission analysis of five different water heating systems for residential buildings in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver