Comparative computational analysis of binding energies between several divalent first-row transition metals (Cr2+, Mn2+, Fe 2+, Co2+, Ni2+, and Cu2+) and ligands (porphine, corrin, and TMC)
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 96-101 |
Journal / Publication | Polyhedron |
Volume | 52 |
Publication status | Published - 22 Mar 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
B3LYP density functional theory calculations were performed to quantify the binding affinities of six divalent first-row transition metals (Cr 2+, Mn2+, Fe2+, Co2+, Ni 2+, and Cu2+) for three well-known macrocyclic ligands (porphine, corrin, and 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane [TMC]). Our calculations show that, as expected from the neutral, monoanionic, and dianionic characters of the TMC, corrin, and porphine ligands, respectively, the binding energy increases in the order TMC <corrin <porphine. This is because a more anionic ligand gives rise to greater electrostatic stabilization upon interaction with the metal cations. For all ligands, the binding energy increases in the order Mn2+ <Cr2+ ∼ Fe2+ <Co2+ <Ni2+ <Cu2+. Single occupation of all five d orbitals in the high-spin Mn2+ complexes does not afford large stabilization due to either ligand-to-metal or metal-to-ligand charge transfer, thereby resulting in the minimum binding energies observed for Mn2+ among the six different metal ions considered.
Research Area(s)
- Binding energy, Corrin, Density functional theory, Metal-ligand interaction, Porphine, Synthetic nonheme ligand
Citation Format(s)
Comparative computational analysis of binding energies between several divalent first-row transition metals (Cr2+, Mn2+, Fe 2+, Co2+, Ni2+, and Cu2+) and ligands (porphine, corrin, and TMC). / Myradalyyev, Serdaraly; Limpanuparb, Taweetham; Wang, Xiaoqing et al.
In: Polyhedron, Vol. 52, 22.03.2013, p. 96-101.
In: Polyhedron, Vol. 52, 22.03.2013, p. 96-101.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review