Comments on the dilemma in the October issue : A request for euthanasia: advising a colleague

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)Comment/debate

View graph of relations

Author(s)

  • Richard Brown

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527
Journal / PublicationIn Practice
Volume38
Issue number10
Online published10 Nov 2016
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2016

Abstract

In the dilemma discussed in the October issue of In Practice, a colleague reluctantly accepted the request to euthanase Bob, a healthy, two-year-old cat. The client was moving house and was not interested in rehoming. Later, a nurse said she could find a good home for the cat. What would you advise? (IP, October 2016, vol 38, pp 469-470). Andrew Knight suggested that the colleague call the client and explain that a new option had arisen. Bob could go to a good home that was far away from the client, so there would be no chance of them seeing him again. However, if the client declined, the dilemma remained. One option might be to tell the client that, in view of the new circumstances, they could no longer agree to the euthanasia; instead they could offer to refund the payment and refer the client to another veterinarian for a second opinion.

Research Area(s)

  • WELFARE, LIFE

Bibliographic Note

Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. With consent from the author(s) concerned, the Research Unit(s) information for this record is based on the existing academic department affiliation of the author(s).