Cognitive Design Features on Traffic Signs

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary Works (RGC: 12, 32, 41, 45)32_Refereed conference paper (with host publication)peer-review

1 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, IMECS 2006
Pages710-715
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science
ISSN (Print)2078-0958

Conference

TitleInternational MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2006 (IMECS 2006)
LocationRegal Kowloon Hotel
PlaceHong Kong
Period20 - 22 June 2006

Abstract

The success of effective communication of traffic sign messages to road users does not only relate to the user characteristics but also the signs themselves. The purpose of this experiment was to examine the cognitive design features of 120 Mainland China traffic signs. The features included familiarity, concreteness, simplicity, meaningfulness, and semantic closeness. Forty-one Hong Kong Chinese undergraduates of engineering discipline who did not take any driving tests before, nor possessed any driving licenses in any places participated voluntarily in this experiment. For each sign, subjects were asked to give subjective ratings between 0 to 100 points for familiarity (0 = very unfamiliar, 100 = very familiar), concreteness (0 = definitely abstract, 100 = definitely concrete), simplicity (0 = very complex, 100 = very simple), meaningfulness (0 = completely meaningless, 100 = completely meaningful), and semantic closeness (0 = very weakly related, 100 = very strongly related). With the exception of familiarity, the mean ratings on the four sign features for all signs were above the midpoint of the 0-100 rating scale. The below mid-point rating (43.87) on familiarity showed that the subjects were not quite familiar with the chosen Mainland China traffic signs. The mean ratings for concreteness, simplicity, meaningfulness, and semantic closeness for all signs were 62.60, 75.81,69.37, and 68.44, respectively, illustrating that the selected traffic signs were perceived to be moderately concrete, simple and meaningful, and related to their intended meanings. Significant and positive relationships were found amongst the sign features of familiarity, concreteness, meaningfulness, and semantic closeness. Other than familiarity, simplicity did not correlate with the other four features. The box plot may be used as a tool for identifying unusual signs for in-depth analysis and for guiding designers to develop new traffic signs at the design stage. The results suggested that cognitive design features are useful for designing more user-friendly traffic signs, which should transmit clear messages about road conditions ahead at the right time to road users. Further research efforts will be given in investigating the effect of sign features on sign comprehension.

Research Area(s)

  • Cognitive design features, Human factors, Icon design, Traffic signs, Usability

Citation Format(s)

Cognitive Design Features on Traffic Signs. / Ng, Annie W.Y.; Chan, Alan H.S.
International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, IMECS 2006. 2006. p. 710-715 (Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science).

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary Works (RGC: 12, 32, 41, 45)32_Refereed conference paper (with host publication)peer-review