Abstract
This article applies a modified conceptual framework derived from Sabatier’s advocacy coalition framework (ACF) and Haas’ epistemic communities’ framework (ECF) to analyze climate advocacy coalitions in Guangzhou, China, a largely unexplored area of study. Our analysis reveals several key features of the climate policy advocacy groups working to promote policy change within the policy subsystem of a non-pluralistic regime: (1) mutual interdependence (consensus building) in the creation of an advocacy coalition system; (2) government recognition and endorsement of newly established or professionally oriented coalition organisations; (3) coalition formation in a top-down manner rather than by accumulative bottom-up demands; and (4) bottom-up motivators, such as changing societal values and the external environment, which contribute to and accelerate the reform of policy orientation and the administrative structure of coalition formation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 10 Feb 2012 |
| Event | Dynamics of Civil Society Coalitions in Asia - Hong Kong, China Duration: 10 Feb 2012 → 11 Feb 2012 |
Conference
| Conference | Dynamics of Civil Society Coalitions in Asia |
|---|---|
| Place | China |
| City | Hong Kong |
| Period | 10/02/12 → 11/02/12 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Climate Advocacy Coalitions in Guangdong, China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver