Abstract
Clicktivism, an emerging form of activism in the digital era, is a concept that can be applied to government-hosted e-petitions. However, an integrative approach combining these two has been scarce. Addressing this gap, this study aims to investigate the dynamics that occur in the process of clicktivism on government-hosted e-petitions, focusing on their themes and intentions. To address our research question, we collected data from South Korea's 'National Petition of the Blue House' and applied multinomial logistic and simple linear regression models to e-petitions that met the criteria for eliciting an official government response. The findings indicate that among the e-petitions meeting the official criteria, those related to political or minority issues received a higher number of supports compared to others. Furthermore, citizens were more inclined to endorse e-petitions seeking punitive actions against specific individuals or organizations, rather than those proposing specific policy or legislative changes. These results suggest that participation through clicktivism is often driven by emotional appeals in petitions. This provides a preliminary framework for understanding citizen engagement behaviors with government-hosted e-petitions and the dynamics that occur in the policy process. © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 37 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Digital Government: Research and Practice |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Online published | 16 Dec 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2024 |
Research Keywords
- Government E-petition
- E-petition Policy
- Clicktivism
- E-citizen
- Paradox of Digital Democracy
Publisher's Copyright Statement
- This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/