Civil mediation in imperial, republican and modern-day China: Historical and cultural norms under the traditional Chinese legal order

Peter C.H. Chan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the position of mediation as a means of civil disputes resolution in China's legal history. While civil adjudication existed in imperial China, the legal tradition of wu song ('[a society] free from litigation') played a fundamental role in shaping China's imperial civil justice system. Under the Confucian ideology, disputes of a civil nature should be settled through conciliatory means so that the amicable relations of the disputants could be maintained. The culture of face-saving and the maintenance of cordial relations remains a distinctive characteristic of the modern Chinese society. This legal historical background provided the ideological foundation for civil procedural systems during the Republican era (1911-1949) and the early days of the People's Republic (since 1949). The current debate on the contemporary mediation system is placed into the appropriate context when one understands that civil process in China today still operates under the shadow of cultural norms of the traditional Chinese legal order.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-602
JournalLegal History Review
Volume85
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Bibliographical note

Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. With consent from the author(s) concerned, the Research Unit(s) information for this record is based on the existing academic department affiliation of the author(s).

Research Keywords

  • Chinese civil justice
  • Chinese legal history
  • Comparative law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Civil mediation in imperial, republican and modern-day China: Historical and cultural norms under the traditional Chinese legal order'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this