Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Chronic effects of polychlorinated dibenzofurans on mink in laboratory and field environments

  • Matthew J. Zwiernik
  • , Kerrie J. Beckett
  • , Steve Bursian
  • , Denise P. Kay
  • , Ryan R. Holem
  • , Jeremy N. Moore
  • , Behzad Yamini
  • , John P. Giesy

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    Mink are often used as a sentinel species in ecological risk assessments of chemicals such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) that cause toxicity mediated through the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor. Considerable toxicological information is available on the effects of PCBs and PCDDs on mink, but limited toxicological information is available for PCDFs. Thus, exposure concentrations at which adverse effects occur could not be determined reliably for complex mixtures in which PCDFs dominate the total calculated concentration of 2, 3, 7, 8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p- dioxin equivalent (TEQ). Two studies were conducted to evaluate the potential toxicity of PCDFs to mink. The first was a chronic exposure, conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, in which mink were exposed to 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2, 3, 7, 8-TCDF) concentrations as great as 2.4 × 103 ng 2, 3, 7, 8-TCDF/kg wet-weight (ww) diet or 2.4×102 ng TEQ2006-WHO-mammal/kg ww diet. In that study, transient decreases in body masses of kits relative to the controls was the only statistically significant effect observed. The second study was a 3-y field study during which indicators of individual health, including hematological and morphological parameters, were determined for mink exposed chronically to a mixture of PCDDs and PCDFs under field conditions. In the field study, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the measured parameters between mink exposed to a median estimated dietary dose of 31 ng TEQ2006-WHO-mammal/kg ww and mink from an upstream reference area where they had a median dietary exposure of 0.68 ng TEQ 2006-WHO-mammal/kg ww. In both studies, concentrations of TEQ 2006-WHO-mammal to which the mink were exposed exceeded those at which adverse effects, based on studies with PCDD and PCB congeners, would have been expected. Yet in both instances where PCDF congeners were the sole or predominant source of the TEQ2006-WHO-mammal, predicted adverse effects were not observed. Taken together, the results of these studies suggest that the values of the mammalian-specific toxicity equivalency factors suggested by the World Health Organization overestimate the toxic potency of PCDFs to mink. Therefore, hazard cannot be accurately predicted by making comparisons to toxicity reference values derived from exposure studies conducted with PCBs or PCDDs in situations where mink are exposed to TEQ mixtures dominated by PCDFs. © 2009 SETAC.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)291-301
    JournalIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management
    Volume5
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

    Bibliographical note

    Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

    Funding

    Funding for the field study described herein was provided through an unrestricted grant from the Dow Chemical Company to Michigan State University.

    Research Keywords

    • 2, 3, 4, 7, 8-PeCDF
    • 2, 3, 7, 8-TCDF
    • Furan
    • Mustela vison
    • TEFs

    Policy Impact

    • Cited in Policy Documents

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Chronic effects of polychlorinated dibenzofurans on mink in laboratory and field environments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this