Abstract
Objective: Somatic symptoms (SS) pose public health burdens, but it remains unclear whether SS should be defined by overall severity or specific symptoms. Therefore, we aimed to identify SS profiles and explore how psychosocial predictors shape these profiles based on the biopsychosocial model.
Methods and measures: From October to December 2020, Chinese college students (n = 598) completed three waves of survey on SS and psychosocial predictors. We used cluster analysis to identify SS profiles, classification and regression tree (CART) to examine psychosocial predictors, and the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) to assess CART’s predictive performance.
Results: Three profiles were identified: high severity and featured gastrointestinal symptoms (high, 23.6%), moderate severity and featured tiredness (moderate, 32.9%), and low in all symptoms (low, 43.5%). These profiles differed in rumination, anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, and peer attachment. Specifically, more rumination and higher anxiety symptoms predicted the membership of the high group. The CART models effectively distinguished the high group (AUC ≥ 0.84) and moderate group (AUC ≥ 0.70) from the low group.
Conclusion: The three symptom patterns enhance our understanding of similarities and differences in SS profiles. Key predictors will inform targeted prevention and intervention for those at higher risk.
© 2026 Informa UK limited, trading as taylor & Francis group.
Methods and measures: From October to December 2020, Chinese college students (n = 598) completed three waves of survey on SS and psychosocial predictors. We used cluster analysis to identify SS profiles, classification and regression tree (CART) to examine psychosocial predictors, and the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) to assess CART’s predictive performance.
Results: Three profiles were identified: high severity and featured gastrointestinal symptoms (high, 23.6%), moderate severity and featured tiredness (moderate, 32.9%), and low in all symptoms (low, 43.5%). These profiles differed in rumination, anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, and peer attachment. Specifically, more rumination and higher anxiety symptoms predicted the membership of the high group. The CART models effectively distinguished the high group (AUC ≥ 0.84) and moderate group (AUC ≥ 0.70) from the low group.
Conclusion: The three symptom patterns enhance our understanding of similarities and differences in SS profiles. Key predictors will inform targeted prevention and intervention for those at higher risk.
© 2026 Informa UK limited, trading as taylor & Francis group.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Psychology & Health |
| Online published | 14 Jan 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Online published - 14 Jan 2026 |
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Project #32071076] awarded to Danhua Lin. The work was also partially funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2023NTSS36] awarded to Mingjun Xie. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Natural Science Foundation of China or the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China.
Research Keywords
- Cluster analysis
- decision tree
- longitudinal data
- psychosocial predictors
- somatic symptoms
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Characterising symptom clusters: examining profiles of somatic symptoms and their psychosocial predictors among chinese youths using longitudinal data with a machine learning approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver