Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Central Government Control over Local Authority Expenditure: The Overseas Experience

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

This article compares the macroeconomic performance of centralized countries and decentralized countries in the OECD between 1984 and 1995. It considers three views of decentralization: the level of state and local taxes, the degree of decentralized power over tax rates, and the freedom of access for states or local authorities to capital markets. The evidence does not support the commonly held fear that decentralized countries may perform worse. In terms of growth, the two types of country seem evenly matched, and in terms of inflation and unemployment, decentralized countries actually seem to perform consistently better. It is possible, because central governments in decentralized countries concentrate on fewer activities, such as macroeconomic policy, that they tend to perform these activities better.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-28
JournalPublic Money and Management
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1999
Externally publishedYes

Policy Impact

  • Cited in Policy Documents

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Central Government Control over Local Authority Expenditure: The Overseas Experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this