Cautions about the Usefulness of Indirect Measures of Personality Based on Personnel Selection Methods

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › Comment/debate › peer-review

View graph of relations

Author(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-477
Journal / PublicationEuropean Journal of Personality
Volume31
Issue number5
Online published25 Oct 2017
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Link(s)

DOI

DOI
Check@CityULib
Link to Scopus https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85043997543&origin=recordpage
Permanent Link https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(d5eea68f-e1b1-466b-b837-a5aee815553f).html

Abstract

Lievens discussed how two personnel selection methods, situational judgment tests and assessment centre exercises, can be used as potentially useful, indirect measurement methods for personality, thus helping to build a bridge between two separate streams of research on personality assessment and personnel selection and ultimately improving the ecological and predictive validity of personality. We provide some alternative perspectives regarding several assumptions and cost‐effectiveness issues underlying Lievens's arguments and suggestions. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology

Fingerprint

Publication fingerprints text

100
Personality Psychology
100
Personnel Psychology
100
personnel INIS
100
Selection Strategy Keyphrases
100
Indirect Measuremen... Keyphrases
100
Personnel Selection Keyphrases
66
assessments INIS
33
Assumption Psychology
33
Judgement Psychology
33
Predictive Validity Psychology
Full Fingerprint ›

Citation Format(s)

[ RIS ] [ BibTeX ]
Cautions about the Usefulness of Indirect Measures of Personality Based on Personnel Selection Methods. / OH, In-Sue; KIM, You Jin; KIM, Myeong Jin.
In: European Journal of Personality, Vol. 31, No. 5, 10.2017, p. 476-477.

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › Comment/debate › peer-review