Cash or card? Impression management and restaurant tipping behavior
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 101837 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics |
Volume | 97 |
Online published | 17 Jan 2022 |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2022 |
Link(s)
Abstract
Existing literature in economics and psychology has documented that impression management is an important motivator of human behavior. However, most of the existing evidence is based on laboratory experiments, where the concern for impression management is artificially induced. We hand-collect a unique data set on restaurant tipping and use the mode of payment to discriminate between impression management and other possible motivations for tipping in a naturally occurring environment. The impression management hypothesis predicts that consumers will tip more frequently when paying by cash, relative to paying by a credit card, because their tipping behavior can be publicly observed and enables them to foster a positive social image. Our three main findings are that (a) the probability of tipping is significantly higher when paying by cash; (b) customers dining alone are significantly less likely to tip and tip significantly lower amounts when paying by cash; and (c) men are significantly more likely to tip and tip larger amounts relative to women. These results are broadly consistent with the impression management hypothesis.
Research Area(s)
- Impression management, Mode of payment, Social image
Citation Format(s)
Cash or card? Impression management and restaurant tipping behavior. / Kakkar, Vikas; Li, King King.
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 97, 101837, 04.2022.
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 97, 101837, 04.2022.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review