Can Training Enhance Public Employees’ Public Service Motivation? A Pretest–Posttest Design

Chung-An Chen*, Chih-Wei Hsieh, Don-Yun Chen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    39 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Recent evidence shows public service motivation (PSM) may be unrelated to one’s consideration of a public service career. In places where civil service examinations prevail, even adverse selection (selecting low-PSM individuals) can occur. This leaves public sector managers with tough questions: “Can we improve new recruits’ PSM? Does training matter?” The present study attempts to answer these questions by using a case of onboard training in Taiwan. We hypothesize that PSM, along with public service–related knowledge and a positive attitude toward public service work, improves after training, and that the improvement hinges on trainees’ satisfaction with training and perceived usefulness of training. Analytical results indicate that knowledge and attitudes are more “trainable” than PSM. Meanwhile, training satisfaction is associated with the growth of public service–related knowledge, while perceived training usefulness relates to a positive attitude toward public service work and PSM. Overall, these findings advance our understanding of the effectiveness of public service training, its determinants, and the implications for public employees’ public service orientations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)194-215
    JournalReview of Public Personnel Administration
    Volume41
    Issue number1
    Online published5 Sept 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

    Research Keywords

    • public service training
    • pretest–posttest design
    • training
    • Taiwan
    • public service motivation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Can Training Enhance Public Employees’ Public Service Motivation? A Pretest–Posttest Design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this