Boron removal with UTC-series reverse osmosis filtration
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 317-321 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
This study compared performance on boron rejection in seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) membrane filtration in a high pressure cross-flow cell. Real seawaters were sampled at the north, east and south coast of Taiwan and the intake ports of SWRO plants in Penghu and Matsu islands. Four types of flat-sheet RO membranes (SG from GE Osmonics and UTC80, UTC80A, and UTC80S from Toray Industries) were tested. Permeate flux, feed flow rate and boron concentrations at room temperature were recorded over testing time. The UTC-series membranes have better performance on both boron and sodium rejection than SG membrane at all tested pH's. Test data sets were available for the first time using SWRO membrane for boron rejection from seawaters in Taiwan. © 2012 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Research Area(s)
- Boron rejection, Reverse osmosis, Seawaters, TDS rejection
Bibliographic Note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].
Citation Format(s)
Boron removal with UTC-series reverse osmosis filtration. / Chiang, Andrew Cheng-Ting; Lin, Justin Chun-Te; Wijayanti, Dewi Ratna et al.
In: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2013, p. 317-321.
In: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2013, p. 317-321.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review