Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Boosting Deep Learning for Interpretable Brain MRI Lesion Detection through the Integration of Radiology Report Information

  • Lisong Dai
  • , Jiayu Lei
  • , Fenglong Ma
  • , Zheng Sun
  • , Haiyan Du
  • , Houwang Zhang
  • , Jingxuan Jiang
  • , Jianyong Wei
  • , Dan Wang
  • , Guang Tan
  • , Xinyu Song
  • , Jinyu Zhu
  • , Qianqian Zhao
  • , Songtao Ai
  • , Ai Shang
  • , Zhaohui Li
  • , Ya Zhang
  • , Yuehua Li*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

32 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

Purpose:  To guide the attention of a deep learning (DL) model toward MRI characteristics of brain lesions by incorporating radiology report–derived textual features to achieve interpretable lesion detection.

Materials and Methods:  In this retrospective study, 35 282 brain MRI scans (January 2018 to June 2023) and corresponding radiology reports from center 1 were used for training, validation, and internal testing. A total of 2655 brain MRI scans (January 2022 to December 2022) from centers 2–5 were reserved for external testing. Textual features were extracted from radiology reports to guide a DL model (ReportGuidedNet) focusing on lesion characteristics. Another DL model (PlainNet) without textual features was developed for comparative analysis. Both models identified 15 conditions, including 14 diseases and normal brains. Performance of each model was assessed by calculating macro-averaged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ma-AUC) and micro-averaged AUC (mi-AUC). Attention maps, which visualized model attention, were assessed with a five-point Likert scale.

Results:  ReportGuidedNet outperformed PlainNet for all diagnoses on both internal (ma-AUC, 0.93 [95% CI: 0.91, 0.95] vs 0.85 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.88]; mi-AUC, 0.93 [95% CI: 0.90, 0.95] vs 0.89 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.92]) and external (ma-AUC, 0.91 [95% CI: 0.88, 0.93] vs 0.75 [95% CI: 0.72, 0.79]; mi-AUC, 0.90 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.92] vs 0.76 [95% CI: 0.72, 0.80]) testing sets. The performance difference between internal and external testing sets was smaller for ReportGuidedNet than for PlainNet (Δma-AUC, 0.03 vs 0.10; Δmi-AUC, 0.02 vs 0.13). The Likert scale score of ReportGuidedNet was higher than that of PlainNet (mean ± SD: 2.50 ± 1.09 vs 1.32 ± 1.20; P < .001).

Conclusion:  The integration of radiology report textual features improved the ability of the DL model to detect brain lesions, thereby enhancing interpretability and generalizability. © 2024, Radiological Society of North America Inc.. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere230520
JournalRadiology: Artificial Intelligence
Volume6
Issue number6
Online published9 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Research Keywords

  • Brain MRI
  • Computer-aided Diagnosis
  • Deep Learning
  • Knowledge-driven Model
  • Radiology Report

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Boosting Deep Learning for Interpretable Brain MRI Lesion Detection through the Integration of Radiology Report Information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this