Abstract
In the past decade, China has increasingly resorted to top-down, “blunt force” solutions to environmental problems; officials forcibly shutter or destroy factories to reduce pollution, at immense cost to local growth and employment. Why would a high capacity state like China resort to such a costly method of pollution control? I argue that blunt force enforcement is targeted at overcoming principal-agent problems in the bureaucracy. When institutions are too weak to hold bureaucrats accountable, political leaders increase oversight by drastically reducing the number of steps and resources required to produce a regulatory outcome—resulting in blunt force measures. I illustrate this logic through case studies from China’s multi-year war on pollution. Using original data on blunt force measures, I then show how localities with lower bureaucratic compliance face greater blunt force pollution enforcement. These findings reveal that when bureaucratic accountability is weak, states pay a very high cost for cleaner air.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 191-209 |
| Journal | Governance |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Online published | 4 Mar 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Blunt force regulation and bureaucratic control: Understanding China's war on pollution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver