Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Blockwise projection matrix versus blockwise data on undersampled problems: Analysis, comparison and applications

  • Zhizheng Liang
  • , Shixiong Xia
  • , Yong Zhou
  • , Youfu Li

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    Linear subspace methods are extensively used in many areas such as pattern recognition and machine learning. Among them, block subspace methods are efficient in terms of the computational complexity. In this paper, we perform a thorough analysis on block subspace methods and give a theoretical framework for understanding block subspace methods. It reveals the relationship between block subspace methods and classical subspace methods. We theoretically show that blockwise PCA has larger reconstruction errors than classical PCA and classical LDA has stronger discriminant power than blockwise LDA in the case of the same number of reduced features. In addition, based on the Fisher criterion, we also give a strategy for selecting an approximate block size for classification problems. The comprehensive experiments on face images and gene expression data are used to evaluate our results and a comparative analysis for various methods is made. Experimental results demonstrate that overly combining subspaces of block subspace methods without considering the subspace distance may yield undesirable performance on undersampled problems. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2774-2785
    JournalPattern Recognition
    Volume44
    Issue number10-11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

    Research Keywords

    • 2DLDA
    • 2DPCA
    • Blockwise LDA
    • Blockwise PCA
    • Face recognition
    • Gene expression data
    • LDA
    • PCA

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Blockwise projection matrix versus blockwise data on undersampled problems: Analysis, comparison and applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this