Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bidding strategies in online auctions with different ending rules and value assumptions

  • Chuangyin Dang
  • , Qiying Hu*
  • , John Liu
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    Abstract Compared with traditional auctions, online auctions (used by, e.g., eBay and Yahoo) have several distinguishing features, including different ending rules (hard-close and soft-close), sequential arrival of customers, and random numbers of customers, all of which make bidding behavior more complex. The phenomenon of late bidding has been reported in the literature and, although the origin of this behavior has been analyzed theoretically, it is still not clear. Here, we study both first- and second-price online auctions with either hard- or soft-close ending rules and assume either private value (PV) or common value (CV). By dividing the auction process into two stages and then using backward induction, we find that late bidding is dominant under CV, but under PV late bidding dominates only in first-price online auctions with hard-close. Moreover, for second-price online auctions the dominant strategy for customers is to report their true value immediately upon arrival under PV but near the end of the auction under CV, irrespective of ending rules. Finally, we find that the timing of customer bidding is the same for hard- and soft-close except for first-price online auctions under PV.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number591
    Pages (from-to)104-111
    JournalElectronic Commerce Research and Applications
    Volume14
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015

    Research Keywords

    • Backward induction
    • Common value
    • Ending rule
    • Late bidding
    • Online auctions
    • Private value

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bidding strategies in online auctions with different ending rules and value assumptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this