Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Beyond the shadow-of-trial: Decision-making behind plea bargaining in Hong Kong

  • Kevin Kwok-yin Cheng*
  • , Wing Hong Chui
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Abstract

A theoretical explanation of plea bargaining is the shadow-of-trial model (Mnookin and Kornhauser, 1979), which asserts that decision-making behind plea bargaining are based on the probability of conviction and sentence severity. Using the context of Hong Kong's criminal justice system, this study confirms previous studies that found the shadow-of-trial model overly simplistic. In-depth interviews with Hong Kong criminal defense lawyers revealed that while the probability of conviction and sentence severity are important, other salient factors, namely the costs of being caught up in the criminal justice system and the one-third sentence discount must be taken into account as well. Overall, the shadow-of-trial model is not a good explanatory model for why criminal defendants enter into plea bargaining.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-411
JournalInternational Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Volume43
Issue number4
Online published23 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Research Keywords

  • Criminal justice
  • Defense lawyers
  • Hong Kong
  • Plea bargaining
  • Shadow-of-trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the shadow-of-trial: Decision-making behind plea bargaining in Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this